News
Friday September 5, 2008
Woman sues for being kept off flight

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- A Pakistan native barred from boarding a US Airways flight at Huntington's Tri-State Airport two years ago is suing the airline claiming her constitutional and civil rights were violated.

Rima Qayyum, who now lives in Jackson, Mich., was detained at the airport security line in August 2006 because she had a water bottle and face cream in her carry-on luggage.

The former Barboursville resident was traveling a week after U.S. authorities banned the carrying of liquids onto flights. The ban came after British officials made arrests in what they said was a plot to blow up U.S.-bound planes using explosives disguised as drinks and other common products.

Qayyum was interrogated for 9 1/2 hours after airport authorities tested the items and found traces of explosive substances, but the lawsuit alleges the test results were false positives. Results of a later laboratory test were negative.

The lawsuit states that Qayyum was targeted because of her ethnicity.

"US Airways had no legitimate nondiscriminatory reason to believe that Plaintiff posed any security risk,'' the lawsuit alleges.

"US Airways should have known, trained and instructed its employees, agents and/or representatives to be aware that treating someone differently on the basis of their perceived race, ethnicity, religion and/or national origin is wrong,'' it says.

While Qayyum was being questioned, she was "denied access to counsel, was illegally detained, an illegal search of her apartment was made and she suffered great emotional distress, worry, anxiety for her health and for the health of her unborn child,'' the lawsuit says.

The lawsuit says she was carrying the water because she was 4 1/2 months pregnant. It also alleges that liquids found in the carry-on bags of other passengers were discarded.

Because of the incident, the terminal was evacuated and kept closed for more than nine hours.

Qayyum eventually drove to her Michigan destination.

The complaint, filed in U.S. District Court in Huntington on Aug. 14, alleges that US Airways "acted intentionally and/or recklessly when it chose to deny her entrance to its aircraft'' and that the airline's "conduct was extreme and outrageous.''

The lawsuit seeks a permanent injunction directing the airline to take affirmative steps to remedy illegal discriminatory conduct. It also seeks reasonable attorney fees and costs, and damages and other relief in an amount to be determined at trial.

Valerie Wunder, a spokeswoman for Tempe, Ariz.-based US Airways, declined to comment Thursday.

Advertiser
Post a Comment

Tags: 0 / 1000
Please be polite.
Offensive and off-topic comments will be removed without warning.
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
Zeke (4:31pm 09-08-2008)
Report Abuse
If I recall, she entered the security area, wearing a burkha and carrying two unmarked bottles of liquid within days of the news reporting a ban on carrying opened liquids onto planes because Muslim extremists had been caught with explosive liquids disguised as drinks. It appears to me she wanted to be detained probably so she could bring this very lawsuit. Who says she hasn't adopted the American way of life?


Curt (4:39pm 09-05-2008)
Report Abuse
James (2 hours ago)Report AbuseThis would have happened the same way if it were any other person. The ban of these items has its orgins from the planned bombings on trans-Atlantic flights by muslims a couple of years back in England and those bans are still in place. Live within the law and this would have never happened. Not sorry about your luck. " Companies who treat human beings that way deserve to be bankrupted," tell that to the FAA and DHS and to the Brits that almost lost several hundred innocent lives because this exact same behavior.


***

It SHOULD have happened the same way but it did NOT happen the same way. That is the point.



One Citizen (3:06pm 09-05-2008)
Report Abuse
Play by our rules in this country or get the heck out. Just cause you don't like them doesn't mean you don't have to obey the rules.


James (2:23pm 09-05-2008)
Report Abuse
This would have happened the same way if it were any other person. The ban of these items has its orgins from the planned bombings on trans-Atlantic flights by muslims a couple of years back in England and those bans are still in place. Live within the law and this would have never happened. Not sorry about your luck. " Companies who treat human beings that way deserve to be bankrupted," tell that to the FAA and DHS and to the Brits that almost lost several hundred innocent lives because this exact same behavior.


Advertiser
Advertiser